The South African Weather Service (SAWS) has confirmed that a message circulating on social media, warning of a storm referred to as “Storm Baron,” is false and should be considered a hoax.
“There is currently no tropical cyclone activity over the south-western Indian Ocean, and there is no officially recognized storm named Baron,” the weather service stated on Thursday.
HOAX!
However, an intense low-pressure system is expected to develop over the southern parts of Mozambique in the coming days. This system is forecast to move further south, bringing widespread showers and thunderstorms to the northeastern regions of South Africa starting early Saturday morning, January 10, 2026, and continuing until Thursday, January 15, 2026.
The areas most likely to be affected include the escarpment and lowveld regions of Limpopo and Mpumalanga, as well as northeastern KwaZulu-Natal.
“It is important to note that there is currently significant uncertainty regarding the exact position of the system’s core, which directly influences the expected intensity of rainfall. While several numerical weather prediction models suggest the core of the system will remain to the east of South Africa, over southern Mozambique, some models indicate it could track much closer to the country,” the SAWS explained.
The first scenario could result in relatively lower rainfall amounts, while the second could lead to excessively high totals, potentially reaching several hundred millimeters in some areas.
The SAWS continues to closely monitor the situation and will provide regular updates as new information becomes available.
The proposed endorsement of the District Development Model (DDM) One Plan 2025 by the Govan Mbeki Municipality Council has come under intense scrutiny from the Freedom Front Plus (VF Plus), with Cllr Aranda Nel-Buitendag submitting a formal list of oversight questions demanding clarity on its legal, financial, and governance implications. The VF Plus has warned against a “rubber-stamp mechanism” that could undermine council oversight and expose the municipality to significant risks.
The matter arose during a council meeting where the municipality was tasked with endorsing the reviewed DDM One Plan 2025, as mandated by Coghta Circular No. 84 of 2025 from the Mpumalanga MEC for Co-operative Governance Human Settlements & Traditional Affairs. The circular directs district and local municipalities to formally adopt and approve the plan, with the resolution then submitted to the MEC’s office to ensure compliance. The DDM One Plan is described as an operational model aimed at improving co-operative governance and building a capable, ethical developmental state, aligned with national regulations requiring annual review and endorsement.
However, Cllr Nel-Buitendag, representing the VF Plus, raised a series of critical concerns, asserting that the council is being deliberately excluded from substantive debate or amendment of the plan.
Aranda Nel-Buidendag
Key Concerns Raised by VF Plus:
Legal Status and Council’s Role: The VF Plus questions whether the endorsement is merely procedural or if the Council retains the legal authority to reject, amend, or impose conditions on the DDM One Plan. They highlighted the absence of a formal legal opinion outlining the implications of endorsement, which is crucial for an informed and lawful decision.
Insufficient Financial Detail: The report on the DDM One Plan refers to an impact on future municipal budgets without providing any quantified financial exposure. The VF Plus demands clarity on the estimated Rand value of commitments, confirmation of a costed implementation plan, and assurance that these commitments are aligned with a funded budget, particularly given the municipality’s existing challenges with unfunded budgets, trading losses on water and electricity, and outstanding bulk service debt.
Accountability and Consequence Management Vacuum: The DDM One Plan acknowledges ongoing governance failures, including irregular expenditure, political interference, and poor audit outcomes. However, the VF Plus notes that the plan lacks mechanisms for assigning responsibility, corrective actions, timelines, or consequence-management measures. They question how accountability will be ensured when the same leadership structures associated with these failures are responsible for implementation.
Erosion of Council Oversight: Concerns were raised that DDM governance structures, chaired by Executive Mayors, could marginalize the Council, MPAC, and other oversight committees. The VF Plus seeks assurances that Council oversight will not be reduced to a formality and that statutory oversight bodies will retain their authority, confirming that endorsement does not limit the Council’s future ability to refuse funding for unfunded projects.
Persistent Service Delivery Failures: While the plan confirms severe service delivery and infrastructure challenges (ageing infrastructure, sewer spillages, electricity failures, Eskom debt, and vandalism), the VF Plus demands clarity on specific, funded interventions scheduled for Govan Mbeki Municipality. They argue that the Council should not endorse long-term development plans while basic service delivery issues persist without concrete solutions.
Questionable Public Participation and Community Legitimacy: The VF Plus points out that the plan acknowledges weak attendance at public participation structures, lack of community feedback, and political interference in ward committees. They request confirmation of documented community inputs that informed the plan and assurance that endorsement will not be used to imply unsubstantiated community support.
Procedural Integrity and Workshop Timing: Finally, the VF Plus found it concerning that a workshop for councillors on the DDM One Plan is proposed after endorsement, rather than before the Council is asked to make such a far-reaching decision. They also seek clarity on whether endorsement binds future Councils and budgets, and if the current Council retains the right to amend or withdraw funding.
The VF Plus has formally requested that these questions be responded to by the Executive Mayor and Municipal Manager, with responses recorded in the Council minutes, and considered prior to or alongside the decision on Item A177/12/2025. Cllr Nel-Buitendag emphasized that “Council cannot lawfully or responsibly endorse a plan of this magnitude without full clarity on affordability, accountability, and oversight safeguards.”
The outcome of these demands and the municipal response will determine whether the DDM One Plan 2025 proceeds with the full backing of the Govan Mbeki Council or faces further delays due to unresolved governance and accountability issues.
The contentious Firearms Control Amendment Bill (FCAB) has resurfaced in South African politics, reigniting a heated debate over gun control and citizen safety.
The proposed legislation, which faced massive public opposition in 2021, aims to overhaul the Firearms Control Act of 2000. Still, critics say it unfairly targets law-abiding gun owners while failing to address the sources of illegal firearms.
At the centre of the controversy is the proposal to remove self-defence as a valid reason for obtaining a firearm licence. For many South Africans, particularly those living in high-crime areas, the move is seen as unreasonable and a betrayal by a state often unable to guarantee public safety.
The Bill, currently under review at the National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC), introduces several stringent measures, including:
Abolishing self-defence as a licence purpose
Reducing licence validity periods
Limiting ammunition purchases
Tightening restrictions on collectors and sport shooters
Expanding discretionary powers for the Police Minister
Opposition parties, civil rights organisations, and firearm advocacy groups argue that the Bill’s focus is misdirected. They point to persistent failures within the South African Police Service (SAPS) and the Central Firearms Register (CFR), which have seen thousands of state-issued firearms lost or stolen and later linked to serious crimes.
Acting Police Minister Firoz Cachalia acknowledged in a parliamentary response that most illegal firearms originate from sources unrelated to licensed civilian ownership. “The increase in illicit firearms entering the Republic is primarily caused by diversion from legal markets, through theft, fraud, straw purchases, cross-border trafficking, and illicit manufacturing,” he said. Cachalia added that firearms are “mainly smuggled from Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Eswatini, and Lesotho.”
Critics say this admission undermines the Bill’s rationale. Jonathan Deal, director of the Safe Citizen Campaign, warned that the legislation disproportionately targets law-abiding owners while leaving the true culprits — corrupt officials and criminal syndicates — untouched.
Jonathan Deal
“Disarming responsible citizens will not stop violent crime. It may, in fact, worsen it,” Deal said. DA MP Ian Cameron, chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Police, echoed these concerns, stating that the Bill would leave ordinary South Africans defenceless.
DA MP Ian Cameron
Proponents, including the Police Ministry, insist that firearm ownership is a privilege, not a constitutional right. Critics counter that in a country with one of the world’s highest murder rates, removing lawful self-defence options effectively strips citizens of their right to life and security of person.
During the 2021 KwaZulu-Natal unrest, private citizens and security companies frequently filled the gaps when police were overwhelmed — a cited example of why responsible firearm ownership remains a safeguard.
Deal emphasised that resources would be better spent on border controls, intelligence operations, and audits of state-issued firearms, rather than imposing “unnecessary and disproportionate burdens” on compliant gun owners.
The Bill is currently in a public participation phase at NEDLAC, with advocacy groups urging South Africans to submit their views, as widespread opposition in 2021 temporarily halted the legislation.
Rip currents are powerful, fast-moving channels of water that flow from the shore back out to sea. These currents are one of the most common dangers at the beach, but are often misunderstood. This article explores what rip currents are, how they form, their causes, types, and dangers, and provides tips on how to stay safe. By gaining a deeper understanding of these natural phenomena, beachgoers can make better choices and reduce their risk of danger in the surf zone.
What Are Rip Currents?
Rip currents are narrow, fast-moving channels of water that push away from the shore. These currents are most often found at surf beaches, particularly where waves break over sandbars, reefs, or near piers and jetties. While rip currents can occur in oceans, they can also form at large freshwater bodies, like the Great Lakes. Even experienced swimmers can find themselves in danger if caught in one. Understanding the behaviour of these currents is crucial for both swimmers and lifeguards to avoid accidents.
What Causes Rip Currents?
The formation of rip is primarily driven by wave action. As waves break over the shore, they push water toward the land, creating a buildup. To release this excess water, it flows back toward the ocean, often finding narrow paths between sandbars, reefs, or structures like piers. The key contributing factors include:
Wave Action: Stronger waves generate more water moving toward the shore, increasing the potential for rips.
Beach Morphology: The shape and structure of the beach and underwater features, such as sandbars and troughs, influence where these currents form and how strong they are.
Multi-feeder & One Feeder: Rip currents can have one main source or multiple sources of water channelling in. One-feeder rips are more common.
Tidal Changes: As the tides rise and fall, the water flow can intensify, contributing to the development of rips.
Weather Conditions: Storms and high winds can alter the beach profile and generate new currents, often making the water more dangerous.
Man-Made Structures: Piers, jetties, and groins can disturb natural water flow, creating rips on their leeward sides.
Beach goers: Humans can also disturb natural water flow and bottom sand conditions, creating feeder currents that can lead to the creation of rips.
Why Are Rip Currents Dangerous?
Rip currents are hazardous because they can quickly carry swimmers far away from shore. Some of these currents are extremely fast, moving at speeds that exceed the swimming speed of even the strongest swimmers. A swimmer caught in one may panic and exhaust themselves, further increasing the risk of drowning. Statistics show that rips cause more than 100 deaths each year in the U.S. and account for over 80% of surf rescues made by lifeguards. Understanding the risks is crucial for anyone spending time at the beach.
How to Identify Rip Currents
Being able to spot rip currents can significantly reduce your risk of getting caught in one. Look for the following signs:
A gap in the breaking waves, which may appear as a darker, smoother patch of water.
Churning or choppy water that moves seaward, often carrying foam, seaweed, or debris.
A noticeable colour difference between the current and the surrounding water.
Faster-moving water moving outward, particularly when it’s calmer than the surrounding area.
Before entering the water, always observe the conditions and check if there are any posted warnings, flags, or advisories for rip currents. Lifeguards are an excellent resource for safety advice and can point out areas of concern.
Components of a Rip Current
Feeder: The “feeder” of a rip current is the portion where the water is directed from the shore toward the main current. This area is typically found near the breaking waves, where the water flows back into deeper areas of the ocean. It is essential to recognise the feeder, as it can look like a narrow, concentrated stream of water moving seaward. The water in this area can flow quickly, carrying any debris or sand in its path. Understanding the flow dynamics of the feeder is crucial for lifeguards and beachgoers alike, as it helps to predict how the rip current may develop and where it will be strongest.
Neck: The “neck” of the rip current is the narrowest, most concentrated part of the current. It occurs after the water has gathered in the feeder, where the flow funnels into a more defined path. This is where the current’s speed is greatest, making it the most dangerous section. The neck can extend several meters offshore, and its strength can often be underestimated by swimmers who think they are just in a small inlet. It’s important to note that, while the neck is usually marked by choppy water and foamy whitewash, it may not always be immediately visible from the shore. Lifeguards should be vigilant in identifying the neck to prevent swimmers from entering it unwittingly.
Head: The “head” of the rip current marks its endpoint, where the water flows out into deeper ocean water beyond the breaking waves. While this part of the rip current is less hazardous in terms of speed, it can still be dangerous because it leads out to an area where the swimmer could be pulled further from shore if they are not cautious. Often, the head is harder to identify than the feeder and neck, but it’s still essential for swimmers to avoid being pulled into this deep-water section. Understanding the flow from the head back to the open ocean helps lifeguards assess how strong the overall rip current may be and aids in making crucial safety decisions.
Types and Sizes of Rip Currents
Rip currents vary in their characteristics, including size, shape, and duration. Some are long-lasting, while others may appear and disappear in a matter of minutes. The type and strength of the current depend on various factors such as wave height, underwater features, and weather conditions. Here’s a breakdown:
Types of Rip Currents
Fixed Rip Currents: These currents are stable and occur on sandy beaches in the same location due to consistent underwater features like sandbars. When surf conditions change, fixed rip conditions may also change due to the movement of the sand. Fixed rips may last hours, days, or even months.
Flash Rip Currents: These currents can form quickly and often disappear just as fast. They may result from a single large wave or sudden changes in wave conditions.
Moving Rip Currents: Similar to flash rip currents, except these rips move along the beach, usually with the prevailing winds and surf direction due to the displacement of the sand after below after set waves. These rips can wreck havoc on beachgoers as they move along the shoreline pulling large numbers of people into deeper water.
Mega Rip Currents: These are large currents that can span the width of multiple normal rip currents. They typically occur during high swell events or after storms.
Permanent Rip Currents: These currents are influenced by man-made or natural coastal structures such as piers, jetties, reefs, or groins. Water piles up on one side, forcing a powerful flow on the other side.
Size Variations
Rip currents can vary widely in their dimensions:
Width: Some currents are narrow, extending only a few meters, while others can stretch over 40 meters across.
Length: These currents may travel just beyond the surf zone or continue hundreds of meters offshore.
Speed: While some rip currents move at 0.5 meters per second, others can reach speeds in excess of 2 meters per second.
Depth: Rips can form in shallow water but often extend several meters deep where the waves do not break.
How to Stay Safe
While rip currents can be dangerous, knowing how to stay safe can make a huge difference. Here are some essential tips to follow when at the beach:
Swim Near Lifeguards: Always choose beaches that have lifeguard supervision, as they can respond quickly in case of an emergency.
Learn to Spot Rip Currents: Observing the water before entering is key. Pay attention to the wave patterns and look for any signs of potential rip currents.
Don’t Fight the Current: If you are caught in a rip current, remain calm and avoid panicking. Try swimming parallel to the shore to escape.
Use Floatation Devices: Make sure to have a floatation device with you when entering the water, particularly if you’re unfamiliar with the conditions.
If Caught in a Rip Current:
Stay Calm: Rip currents typically do not pull swimmers under the water.
Swim Parallel: Swim across the current to escape its pull. Once free, swim toward the shore.
Signal for Help: If you’re unable to escape, signal for help by waving your arms and shouting.
Rescuing Others:
If you see someone caught in a rip current, immediately alert a lifeguard or call 911.
If you cannot safely perform a rescue, throw them a floatation device and wait for trained professionals to respond.
Advanced Detection and Safety Measures
Modern technology is helping lifeguards and coastal authorities improve safety measures and save lives. Drones, equipped with high-resolution cameras and thermal imaging, are now being used to detect rip currents in real-time and monitor large stretches of coastline more efficiently than ever before. Artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced monitoring systems analyse wave patterns, currents, and other environmental factors to predict dangerous conditions and provide early warnings to beachgoers.
Many beaches have implemented real-time forecasting systems and rip current alerts based on a combination of weather, wave, and tide data, accessible via mobile apps, websites, and even electronic signage at the beach. These tools not only enhance the ability to identify and respond to rip currents but also improve public education by raising awareness about beach safety. Together, these innovations are playing a significant role in reducing beach-related incidents, empowering both lifeguards and beachgoers to make safer decisions.
Fascinating Facts About Rip Currents
They Don’t Pull You Under: Rip currents do not pull swimmers beneath the water; they only carry them out to sea.
Speed: While some currents move at average speeds of 1-2 feet per second, others can reach up to 8 feet per second.
Global Phenomenon: Rip currents are not confined to oceans. They also occur at lakes, such as the Great Lakes, where similar conditions can create powerful currents.
Variability: The size and strength of rip currents can change depending on the weather, tide, and wave conditions.
How Rip Currents Form
Rip currents are formed when the breaking waves create variations in water pressure and flow. Water moves toward the shore with the waves and then seeks a way to return to the sea. This movement often funnels through areas where there is less resistance, such as gaps between sandbars, reefs, or near structures. Various factors like the shape of the coastline, the power of the waves, and the tides all influence where and how rip currents form.
Tips for Avoiding Rip Currents
Check Beach Conditions: Many beaches post signs or flags indicating dangerous water conditions. Always check before swimming.
Consult Lifeguards: Ask lifeguards about the safest areas to swim and whether any dangerous currents have been reported.
Stay Aware: Always monitor the movement of water while in the surf zone. If conditions seem to change suddenly, be prepared to exit the water.
Final Thoughts
Understanding rip currents—how they form, their causes, types, and how to react—can save lives. Whether you’re a seasoned swimmer or a first-time beachgoer, it’s crucial to respect the ocean’s power. Before heading into the water, consult lifeguards and stay informed about current conditions.
For more lifesaving tips, signs and information, visit the National Sea Rescue Institute (NSRI) website at https://www.nsri.org.za. Stay safe, stay informed, and enjoy the beach responsibly.
Information taken from: https://www.islasurf.org/what-is-a-rip-current/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22108324510&gbraid=0AAAAADzxDWoWR00MK7NJfa7ja76wSENZu&gclid=Cj0KCQiAxonKBhC1ARIsAIHq_lvObjINnQlF6O9Vidl3bHV7MOikk3qUwngiwBMqdqMjFOeYgK58GtkaAqX9EALw_wcB
Open parks in Secunda are cherished destinations where residents can unwind and connect with nature. However, the recent influx of large groups of contractors and companies at the Duckpond and Vinkedam areas—where Secunda Parkrun begins—has created significant challenges. Over the past few weekends, hundreds of individuals have flocked to these locations, especially on The Day of Reconciliation. Unfortunately, this surge in visitors has led to troubling incidents of public intoxication, littering, and disorderly conduct.
The dam area at Evander, too, has seen an increase in visitors, but this has not come without consequences. Many parkgoers reportedly engage in excessive drinking, violating local bylaws that prohibit alcohol consumption in public spaces. This behaviour has turned the once serene parks into dumping grounds for litter, including empty bottles and other debris. Moreover, social media buzzes with complaints about the disruptive actions of these visitors, including the reckless use of fireworks that alarm nearby residents.
The situation has also attracted vagrants who have begun to sleep in the area, and municipal response has been minimal. As these issues escalate, the safety of the green spaces in the Govan Mbeki Municipality (GMM) has increasingly come into question.
DA Councillor Mariaan Chamberlain recently submitted a motion to the council, highlighting the need to restore the Duckpond area to its former glory. In her motion, she pointed out that under the maintenance of IKUSASA, a division of SASOL, the park was kept in pristine condition, with security personnel patrolling around the clock. This vigilance ensured compliance with regulations that prohibited drinking, fishing, motorcycles, weapons, and overnight camping in the park.
DA Councillor Mariaan Chamberlain
After the facility was handed over to the municipality, however, the standard of maintenance and security sharply declined. Presently, there is only one security guard tasked with monitoring the entire area, which severely hampers efforts to uphold laws and maintain order. As a result, the park has become a hotspot for drug users, vagrants, and individuals abusing alcohol, leading to a hazardous environment marked by syringes, condoms, and general disorder. Families with young children are particularly vulnerable, as these conditions put their safety and well-being at risk.
Attempts by residents to address these issues directly with offenders have often been met with indifference. Offenders have reportedly dismissed their concerns with statements such as, “We have seen the notice boards, but the law is not enforced.” Disturbingly, residents have also reported incidents of violence, including assaults with weapons, while walking or cycling within the park.
To address these pressing concerns, Councillor Chamberlain outlined a series of actions in her resolution. The community, which has taken it upon itself to manage park maintenance—including emptying refuse bins provided by generous donors and upgrading bathroom facilities—requests the following measures:
Repair broken gate hinges to ensure the park gates close properly.
Establish clear opening and closing hours for the park gates.
Empower the security guard with the authority to search all vehicles entering the park, denying entry to any that contain alcohol.
Reinforce the prohibition of public drinking and enforce this law to safeguard children.
Remove all informal structures erected within the area.
Prohibit overnight sleeping in the park to prevent encampments and encourage a safe, orderly environment.
These measures are vital for restoring a safe and enjoyable park experience for all residents, particularly children. The motion has been accepted unopposed by the council and referred to the Mayoral Committee for consideration. However, there are concerns that the urgency required to implement these changes may not be prioritised by the committee.
Historically, similar motions have been delayed or stalled after referral, leading to frustrations among residents. A motion submitted over two years ago concerning extreme pollution in the area remains unaddressed, despite an approved budget that was never utilised.
“We cannot allow this type of behaviour to continue,” emphasised DA Councillor Mariaan Chamberlain. “When will the municipality take action? Must we wait for a tragedy, perhaps involving a minor?”
As the situation in Secunda continues to evolve, the call for swift action grows louder. Residents and officials alike hope for meaningful change that will not only restore the parks but also ensure the safety and enjoyment of these cherished community spaces for years to come.
The recent comments regarding the state of the park following recent functions highlight a growing concern among community members about cleanliness and responsibility. Many expressed frustration over the littering and neglect that have turned what should be a welcoming area for families into a troubled, messy environment. Suggestions include holding those responsible accountable, with a strong call for the municipality to regulate alcohol use to prevent rowdy behaviour that contributes to the mess. Community volunteers are stepping up to help clean up, showing great civic spirit, but long-term solutions are essential. Increased patrols and consistent clean-up efforts could foster communal respect for the park, ensuring it remains a safe and enjoyable space for everyone.
The Festive Season is one of the busiest times on our roads, with thousands of people travelling to holiday destinations. Unfortunately, this increase in traffic often leads to an increase in road accidents, many of which can be prevented through responsible behaviour. Sasol would like to remind you that road safety is everyone’s responsibility.
Why Road Safety Matters
Every year, lives are lost due to speeding, fatigue, distracted driving, and alcohol-related incidents. These tragedies are avoidable. By making smart choices behind the wheel, you protect not only yourself but also your loved ones and other road users. For the safety of yourself and fellow road users, please take note of the following safety tips:
Plan Ahead
Before you hit the road, ensure your vehicle is in good condition. Check your brakes, tyres, lights, and fluid levels. Plan your route and allow extra time for delays, rushing leads to risky decisions.
Rest Before Driving
Fatigue is a silent killer. If you’re tired, postpone your trip or take regular breaks every two hours. Share the driving if possible.
Avoid Alcohol and Drugs
Drinking and driving is never worth the risk. Arrange a designated driver or use safe transport options. Remember: alcohol impairs judgment.
Buckle Up
Seatbelts save lives. Make sure everyone in the car is strapped in, no matter how short the trip.
Stay Alert
Put your phone away. No message or call is worth a life. Keep your focus on the road and anticipate the actions of other drivers.
Obey Speed Limits
Speeding reduces your reaction time and increases the severity of crashes. Slow down and enjoy the journey.
Residents of Secunda have faced ongoing water outages and communication challenges regarding the Extension 22 reservoirs, which play a crucial role in our community’s water supply stability. As noted by DA Councillor Fiona Pelman, “This situation did not begin today. It began shortly after the significant Rand Water maintenance shutdown in 2024.” The community suffered through lengthy water shortages, with residents often left without access for up to 16 days at a time.
Ward 21 DA Councilor Fiona Pelman
The condition of the Extension 22 reservoirs deteriorated significantly, prompting the Democratic Alliance to advocate for funding to refurbish the infrastructure. After persistent efforts, R3 million was allocated for restoration and rehabilitation. However, the project has been riddled with issues, including vandalism, poor workmanship, contractor incompetence, and significant delays. Councillor Pelman remarked on her frustrations: “Instead of clarity and accountability, we received silence or uncertainty — despite the ongoing impact on residents and the seriousness of the infrastructure involved.”
Despite escalations to national representatives, including Parliamentarian Stephen Moore, and the confirmation from the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA) that repairs were 95% complete and expected to be finalised by 30 October 2025, there remains uncertainty. “Today — 11 December 2025 — as Secunda again faces another Rand Water maintenance outage, we still do not have the remaining 5% completed,” Councillor Pelman stated. “There is no official communication explaining the outstanding work, the delays, or the obstacles preventing full completion.”
The matter has escalated to the Human Rights Commission due to the violation of basic human rights caused by prolonged water outages. Councillor Pelman emphasised the need for answers and transparency: “Residents deserve functioning, reliable water infrastructure — not repeated empty promises, moving deadlines, and chronic operational failures.”
In her correspondence with the Govan Mbeki Municipality (GMM), Councillor Pelman formally requested comprehensive updates on the refurbishment status. Her inquiries included essential details about the current completion percentage, progress on necessary installations, potential defects, budget expenditure, contractor performance, and community notifications. She stressed that timely information is crucial for public communication and oversight.
In an official response from GMM Executive Mayor Cllr NG Zuma, several questions regarding the refurbishment were addressed. While some aspects, such as electrical maintenance, were reported to be complete, challenges persist due to a malfunctioning control valve affecting the reservoir’s functionality. The municipality is making efforts to appoint contractors for necessary installations, yet the timeline for full operational status remains unclear.
Councillor Pelman sums up the disappointment felt by the community: “We have come full circle — from 2024’s outages to a R3 million refurbishment, to Parliament, to CoGTA, to the HRC — and yet we still do not have a functioning reservoir system or accountability for the delays.” The residents of Secunda demand transparency, accountability, and above all, a reliable water supply — vital for every household and essential for the well-being of the community.
As Secunda continues to grapple with these pressing infrastructure issues, it is vital for the municipality to communicate effectively and restore trust among its residents. They deserve a resolution to this crisis, along with transparent updates on the future of the water supply in their town.
Govan Mbeki Municipality: Forensic Investigation Uncovers R23 Million in Unauthorised Consolidations, Sparking Demands for Police Action and Accountability Amidst Prolonged Fraud
A comprehensive investigation report into deeply troubling financial irregularities within the Govan Mbeki Municipality’s credit suspense accounts was tabled to council on Thursday, 4 Dec 2025, spanning from 2022 to 2025. The inquiry was initiated following a complaint from Sasol regarding discrepancies in their credit account balances, highlighting a systemic issue of unauthorised consolidations that had been ongoing for a significant period.
Core of the Problem: Unauthorised Consolidations Over Time. The investigation by Peyper Attorneys Inc. revealed a pervasive practice of “incorrect consolidations,” which fundamentally differs from legitimate consolidations.
Correct Consolidation: Involves combining balances from one account to another, typically for accounts on the same property (ERF number), often with an owner’s request and supporting documentation.
Incorrect Consolidation: Characterised by combining balances between accounts not associated with the same ERF number and lacking proper supporting documentation. This typically involved transferring a credit balance from one customer’s account (Customer A) to another (Customer B), where the properties were unrelated. The intent appeared to be to use these unauthorised transfers to offset outstanding debts owed to the municipality, thereby disadvantaging both legitimate clients and the municipality itself.
Investigation Details and Scope: Peyper Attorneys Inc. was tasked with a forensic investigation into the Finance Department’s credit suspense account to identify irregularities, determine accountability, identify beneficiaries and losses, and pinpoint preventative control failures. The investigation uncovered that these alleged consolidations and reversals were conducted using the municipal financial system, Munsoft, which manages financial operations, billing, and metering. These actions were found to transgress several municipal policies, including those on Unclaimed Deposits, Cash Receipts and Banking, and Circular 15 of the mSCOA, as well as broader laws and regulations.
The following Acts and Policies were transgressed:
Local Government: Municipal System Act, Act 32 of 2000, as amended.
Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, Act 56 of 2003.
Supply Chain Management Policy.
Cash Receipts & Banking Policy.
Unclaimed Deposits Policy.
Key Preliminary Findings & Financial Impact: The scale of the problem is substantial:
The fraud had been committed over a prolonged period, stretching back as far as eight years prior to the investigation. This deliberate backdating of transactions was clearly an attempt to disguise the fraudulent activities.
Initially, 21,352 transactions involving 12 employees/operators were identified, amounting to R30,420,514.93.
After filtering out legitimate consolidations (e.g., those between accounts with shared details like ID numbers or physical addresses), 16,044 transactions remained flagged as unauthorised, resulting in a direct financial loss of R23,227,963.31 to the municipality.
These unauthorised transfers were conducted across various service charges, including payments, water, rates, electricity, sewerage, and refuse.
Six employees were initially suspected of involvement, with three resigning during the investigation stage.
Impact on Accounts: The investigation categorised affected accounts into three groups:
Benefited Accounts: 340 municipal accounts received credit transfers through consolidations, totalling R25,168,327.88.
Disadvantaged Accounts: 4,683 accounts were negatively impacted by consolidations, totalling R23,378,097.85.
Neutral Accounts: 88 accounts experienced both unauthorised consolidations and subsequent reversals, meaning they neither benefited nor were disadvantaged.
Digital Forensics and Operator Involvement: Digital forensic analysis of computers revealed instances where municipal employees extracted reports containing credit balances, which were then emailed. Subsequently, unauthorised consolidations for the same amounts often occurred on the same day the emails were sent, involving unrelated accounts. Specific examples included workbooks titled “Book3” and “Book4” being used to facilitate consolidations amounting to tens of thousands of Rands. The report highlights that certain individuals, through due diligence, were identified as having benefited significantly, including at least one municipal employee who benefited R122,006.64 from combined consolidations and transfers.
Recommendations to the Council: The report puts forth several critical recommendations to the Council:
Acknowledge and Address: Recognise the appointment of Peyper Attorneys Inc. and the severity of the 16,044 unauthorised transactions totalling R23,227,963.31, implicating six employees (three of whom resigned).
Stakeholder Engagement: Convene a meeting with relevant stakeholders to determine the immediate course of action.
Communication with Beneficiaries: Issue formal letters to all account holders identified as having benefited from unauthorised consolidations. These letters will require them to provide written explanations and supporting documentation for the credits received within 14 days.
Transaction Reversal: Based on the review of submissions, if no valid justification or evidence is provided, the Municipality should proceed to reverse the unauthorised consolidations and adjust the affected accounts accordingly.
Formal Criminal Proceedings:Crucially, the report strongly recommends engaging with the Municipality’s legal department to open a formal case with the South African Police Service (SAPS) and the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI). This step is paramount for pursuing criminal accountability for the alleged fraud and corruption. The urgency of this recommendation has been amplified by external scrutiny, with the Democratic Alliance (DA), through Cllr Portia Mpatlanyana, questioning the apparent lack of action and asking directly why no police cases have been opened. This concern is particularly salient given the observed trend of employees resigning during investigations, a tactic often employed to circumvent accountability, operating under the assumption that many municipalities, and in particular Govan Mbeki Municipality (GMM), may not pursue prosecution once the individuals are no longer in their service. Addressing this widespread perception requires immediate and decisive legal action, irrespective of employment status.
Further Investigation & Conclusion: Continue investigating all remaining red-flagged transfers and conclude the comprehensive digital forensics investigation to capture all findings in the final report.
The presentation of this draft report to the Council underscores the gravity of the financial malfeasance and the prolonged period over which it occurred. The calls from the DA for immediate police involvement highlight a critical demand for decisive action to address the significant losses, hold perpetrators accountable regardless of their employment status, and restore public trust in the municipality’s financial integrity. The council is expected to address why formal criminal cases have not yet been opened despite the extensive evidence and clear recommendations.
The Secunda Archery Club is thriving and providing a remarkable opportunity for archery enthusiasts in the area! With lessons available every Friday afternoon at Goedehoop Primary School, it’s a fantastic chance for both beginners and experienced archers to advance their skills in a welcoming environment. It’s noteworthy that the club has grown from just 5 members to over 100, reflecting the community’s increasing interest and passion for the sport.
The recent club meeting held at Laerskool Goedehoop, where trophies were awarded to recognise member achievements, underscores the club’s commitment to celebrating the contributions of its members. Particularly special is the Mari Curi trophy, awarded to the individual who has made the most significant impact on the club and its members. This kind of recognition fosters a sense of camaraderie and motivation within the group.
If you have any specific questions regarding the club, its activities, or archery in general, Christi-Arno would be more than happy to assist you! He may be contacted on 083 324 6586/ 084 250 3042
Thank you Deon Smit, Suzette en Divan for the photos
IN THE REGIONAL COURT FOR THE REGIONAL DIVISION OF KWA ZULU NATAL HELD AT NEWCASTLE CASE NO: KZN/NC/RC 955/2020
In the matter between: NAVANI CHETTY [PLAINTIFF] And BERTLEN DANIEL CHETTY [DEFENDANT]
ABBREVIATED SUMMONS
TO: Mr Bertlen Daniel Chetty (Defendant), a male formerly residing at Aloe Ridge 2, Unit 4121, 125 Stoneridge Drive, Greenhill Extension 30, Johannesburg, or 17 Crescrum Street, Palmridge, Germiston, but whose present whereabouts are unknown;
Abbreviated Summons dated 21 July 2021
TAKE NOTICE that by summons issued by this Court, you have been called upon to give notice within ten (10) days after publication hereof to the Registrar, 33 Murchison Street, Newcastle, 2940 (Private Bag X6655, Newcastle, 2940) and to the Plaintiff/Plaintiff’s legal practitioner of your intention to defend (if any) in an action wherein NAVANI CHETTY (Plaintiff) avers as follows:
Plaintiff and Defendant were married to each other in community of property at Ladysmith on the 25th of April 2015, which marriage still subsists.
Two minor children were born from the marriage between the parties, namely:
Tiaego Daniel Chetty, a boy born on 16 September 2015;
Ava Martez Chetty, a girl born on 17 August 2016.
The marriage relationship between the parties has irretrievably broken down for the following reasons, namely: 3.1. There is no meaningful communication between the parties; 3.2. Defendant has committed adultery; 3.3. Defendant has fathered a child with another lady; 3.4. The parties are not living together as husband and wife since August 2019; 3.5. The Defendant was physically and verbally abusive towards Plaintiff; 3.6. Plaintiff has lost all love and affection for the Defendant; 3.7. Plaintiff has lost all interest in the continuation of the marital relationship.
It will be in the best interests of the minor children if primary care and residence are awarded to the Plaintiff, subject to the Defendant having reasonable rights of contact with the minor children.
Plaintiff is in need of maintenance for the minor children in the sum of R1000.00 (One Thousand Rands) per month per child.
Wherefore Plaintiff prays for an order against the Defendant as follows:
a. A decree of divorce; b. Primary care and residence of the minor children, subject to the Defendant having reasonable rights of contact with the minor children; c. Defendant to pay maintenance in respect of the minor children in the sum of R1000.00 per month per child; d. Costs of suit only in the event of the action being defended; e. Further and/or alternative relief.
TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that if you fail to give such notice, judgment may be granted against you without further reference to you.
